Wednesday, February 1, 2012

Film Review: Tim and Eric's Billion Dollar Movie

Tim & Eric's Billion Dollar Movie (2012)
dir. Tim Heidecker, Eric Wareheim
Rating: ✮✮1/2

Once again proving the Law of Sketch Comedy Not Translating Well to the Big Screen, Tim & Eric's Billion Dollar Movie takes their by turns brilliant, repulsive, and occasionally downright awful (intentionally and otherwise) sketch TV work and expands it from 11 minute packets of delirious lunacy into a 90 minute manifesto that, like the Strangers With Candy movie before it, makes one yearn for the more focused craziness of the TV show that spawned it.

Their Tom Goes to the Mayor and Tim and Eric Awesome Show Great Job! boasted hilariously scathing parodies of trash culture, from hideous infomercials to wretched 80s rock videos, B-movies and, my personal favorite, small town TV news, in the form of "Married News Team" Jan and Wayne Skylar (assisted by the terminally clueless Dr. Steve Brule, played by John C. Reilly, who shows up here in a different role). Whereas those shows thrived on the menagerie of grotesque Americana characters constantly hurled at the screen, "B$M" focuses almost exclusively on the titular duo's fictional counterparts, and while the in-universe Tim and Eric make for amusing straight men to the ridiculous goings-on around them in their TV incarnations, their constant presence here eventually proves off-putting. Heidecker and Wareheim predictably ratchet up the f-bombs, violence and body humor--to alarming degrees in the latter case--but somehow fail to recognize that part of what made their skit work so funny was the barriers imposed upon them by standards and practices, and the often disturbing ways they subverted them. Here, with no such limitations, they go off the deep end into full blown frat house humor. Worse still, the celebrity cameos ("Chef" Goldblum aside) are distracting and mostly unfunny--Zach Galifianakis is cringe-worthy as always, in a bad way--and the mean-streak that lurked within Tom Goes to the Mayor and Awesome Show becomes far too prominent, lending many of the jokes and the film's climax a nasty aftertaste.

Granted, it's all still pretty amusing, and the duo sporadically manage to deliver the kind of brilliantly hilarious nightmare fuel that is their stock and trade, but they fail to fully capitalize on their abandoned shopping mall locale and the opportunities for biting satire it presents. Nevertheless, the absurdly horrific revelation of "Shrim" will surely linger in audience's minds long after they've left the cinema (or their rental window has expired)--for better or worse. 

Sunday, January 22, 2012

Film Review: Antichrist (2009)

ANTICHRIST (2009)
dir. Lars von Trier
Rating: ✮✮✮1/2

Oh, Lars.

ANTICHRIST is a film with a lot of fascinating ideas rolling around in its fucked-up head, but none of them really coalesce into something satisfyingly concrete--which is probably von Trier's intention, but unfortunately lends the film an air of "if only...." The first half is curiously dull, and one finds themselves waiting for things to spring to life, but when it finally does, it never quite manages to attain the level of despairing horror it seems to be going for until the very third act, where She drags He back to their cabin and the film's bleakness finally manages to sink into the viewer's bones. What ultimately redeems Antichrist is its brilliant cinematography, Gainsbourg's performance (although she's not nearly as flawless as some critics would lead you to believe) and, most of all, its ideas.

Interpretations (contains SPOILERS):
As stated by the film, Nature is evil, what with all the endless death and predation and wretchedness, so it could not have been created by God--it could only have been created by Satan. Applying ancient gender stereotypes (even the old "women are clingy and afraid of men leaving them" gets thrown into the mix), the film posits that women are closer to nature (the "Mother" in "Mother Nature"), and therefore inherently evil. Men are just as evil, but like Willem Dafoe's smug asshole of a therapist, they don't realize it, and try to impose reason and order upon Nature, where as a talking auto-cannibalistic fox points out, "chaos reigns!" He thinks he can rationalize away his inherent murderous animalism, but in the end, nature will drag him back down with his female counterparts.

Sex is evil. In an interview, von Trier has mentioned that he thinks sex is something that holds human beings back from truly being civilized. So, in Antichrist language: She is a woman, woman is nature, nature is barbaric, sex is nature, She wants sex constantly, sex is barbaric. He and She are divided by sex, both the physical act and gender. It is the natural catalyst for their downward spiral. Their child dies while the two are doing it, and She is too far-gone in mid-orgasm to care as she sees her son topple out the window. This is what re-ignites her self-hating madness.

Charlotte Gainsbourg's character goes progressively more insane researching gynocide, the killing of women by men. She comes to believe that all women are just as evil as they are portrayed in the Bible and other historical texts ("A crying woman is a scheming woman..."). What's more, she fears that gynocide is the natural order of things (He: "I am nature" She: "What do you want, Mr. Nature?" He: "To hurt you as much as I can.") He dismisses this as ridiculous, but as She goes progressively more insane and violent, Nature seemingly guides him toward Her conclusion, and he eventually murders her and burns her body. Nature rewards him with food for following out with its plans--the implication being that gynocide and misogyny are part of nature, and are an inherited Darwinian trait. Which is, unfortunately, true (examine the behaviors of all animal species in existence--the VAST majority are male-dominated, even non-sentient organisms; nature favors the male on top for some reason). von Trier has sneakily, and probably facetiously, encoded a psuedo-feminist subtext here to counter the film's over-the-top misogyny: If Nature is evil and Satanic, then so is misogyny, as it is a big part of nature.

Does Lars von Trier hate women? The constant accusations of misogyny he's accumulated in Phase II of his career (Breaking the Waves and everything since) have always struck this reviewer as missing the point. von Trier characters are not people, they are Ideas dressed up in human form. When Emily Watson, Bjork and Nicole Kidman are subjected to horrific treatment in his films, it is not because they are women, it is because their characters represent something. It's no different in his earlier films, where the male protagonists suffer equally horrible, drawn out fates (see the end of Europa). In a recent interview, von Trier stated that he thinks "women are just as bad as men," which, its prankster-ish wording aside, is more than anything a sensibly misanthropic, as opposed to misogynistic, point of view. 

Film Review: Melancholia (2011)

MELANCHOLIA (2011)
dir. Lars von Trier
Rating: ✮✮✮1/2
Lars von Trier's latest plays like Antichrist's stately older sister--the same bleak nihilism and despair is at work, but here it is delivered with gorgeous romance imagery and Wagner instead of snipped lady parts and gynocidal immolation.

The film is divided into a Prelude and two parts, "Part I: Justine" and "Part II: Claire", with the prelude being a stunning succession of ultra slow-motion imagery set to Wagner's prelude from "Tristan and Isolde." It's an unforgettable bit of filmmaking. "Part I" is where problems crop up. Essentially a farcical wedding black comedy, it's severely undercut by von Trier's arch dialogue and the simple fact that, as he made perfectly clear at the Cannes press conference for this film, his sense of humor is not in any way funny. One running gag with Udo Kier refusing to look at Kirsten Dunst gets some chuckles, but the rest falls curiously flat.

But then comes "Part II", in which we watch Charlotte Gainsbourg and Kirsten Dunst give terrific, career-best performances as they become trapped and isolated in their sprawling castle estate whilst the titular planet hurtles toward the Earth. As someone who sometimes suffer from depression themselves, this reviewer sympathized greatly with the film's authentic depiction of the way depression manifests itself in irrationally fearful and reckless behavior, constantly alienating those around you and making even simple daily tasks unbearably difficult--not to mention the occasional cruelty you can spit out at people who love you. In that respect, Dunst nails her role, but the real showcase performance here comes from Gainsbourg, whose descent into anxiety and despair is heartwrenching; a scene where she desperately tries to flee the estate and starts breaking down as every method of flight fails is powerful indeed.

As with Antichrist, this is an extremely frustrating film that brings up big ideas few others would touch--here, as with the former, it's the notion that all life on Earth is evil, corrupt and predatory and deserves to be destroyed, and that there is no other life in the entire universe; when our planet is destroyed there will be no one around to mourn our passing. Melancholia deals with these themes in an oblique, indirect manner that will be familiar to von Trier fans, and while one wishes he would tear into his preoccupations a bit more (he is really the only director working whose films are sincerely nihilistic, not just fashionable posing), Melancholia is still a monument to his incredible skill as a master visualist and to the talents of his actors.


Franchise in Review: The ALIEN Anthology

Most kids had Star Wars--I had Alien. I was either four or five at the time, when I looked up from my Jurassic Park coloring book to see an ad for Alien on the Sci-Fi Channel. It looked like the most amazing thing I'd ever seen. I managed to remember the day it was on and begged my parents to change the channel to Sci-Fi--and after much whining they complied, but, alas, I had missed most of it and only saw the last act. No matter--that was enough to galvanize my love of all things Alien. I somehow found out that our neighbor owned the trilogy on VHS, and innocently knocked on her door, asking to borrow it. I can still recall perfectly the nervous double take she gave, considering these were R-rated films and I was barely out of kindergarten. "Do you have your parents' permission?" I lied and said, "yes." Victory. I took the boxset home and duped it in our VCR, and then proceeded to watch all three of them nearly every day for what must have been a couple of years. I cannot begin to estimate how many times I've seen the original trilogy--to paraphrase Ripley in Alien³, "You've been in my life so long, I can't remember anything else."

I credit my intense devotion to Alien and its three sequels for giving me an instant dose of cinematic "taste" at such a young age--and I can trace many of my principal interests back to the series. It is a singular achievement in the history of film, managing to combine Freudian psychosexuality, feminism, avant garde/neo-classical scoring, cynical left-wing ideology, existentialism and hard (well, the original trilogy, anyway) science fiction into something that will probably never again be equaled. Is there any other series that challenged what franchise cinema could be on such a grand scale? While Star Wars and its ilk descended into crass, juvenile pandering and commercialism, the Alien "quadrilogy" never took the easy way out, never conformed to what people wanted. Even in the face of nervous studio executives and unadventurous American audiences, it soldiered on with grim determination to be something artistically conscious, unafraid to broach themes and ideas that ordinarily wouldn't make it past a first draft in the conservative studio machine.
(All star ratings out of ✮✮✮✮. Films that have not been seen by the reviewer receive a "No rating" designation.)

ALIEN (1979)
dir. Ridley Scott
Rating: ✮✮✮✮
The original Alien is something of a miracle, one in which everything falls into place in such a ludicrously perfect fashion, as though assembled according to some divine cinematic plan--a convergence of multi-faceted brilliance ranging from Ridley Scott's impeccable visuals, the pitch-perfect cast, Jerry Goldsmith's influential score, Walter Hill and David Giler's elegant screenplay, the ingenious editing job by Terry Rawlings, and most importantly, the unforgettable conceptual designs of H.R. Giger.

Alien remains Ridely Scott's only true masterpiece (if anything, the man is more craftsman than filmmaker), and is both the best of the sci-fi genre (next to Kubrick's 2001) as well as the horror genre--a lofty accomplishment. Like 2001, it is endlessly imitated and its influence is inescapable. It shattered the cinema screen's glass ceiling in ways only its sequels (and possibly Terminator 2) managed to live up to, and impacted filmmaking in ways more subtle and meaningful than Star Wars ever did. To continue praising the film and expand on its myriad of merits would be redundant in the massive wake of literature that has been justly written about it (despite its initially mixed reception from typically short-sighted critics--even Ebert disliked the film when it was first released, yet it somehow found its way onto his list of "Great Movies" decades later). Its greatness is simply a stone cold fact. One can only hope Scott's upcoming prequel, Prometheus, reclaims similar heights.


ALIENS (1986)
dir. James Cameron
Rating: ✮✮✮1/2
Aliens may be the greatest action movie ever made, but as a sequel to Alien it comes up short. Oh, sure, the ravenous fanboy contingent routinely declares, with fascist indignation, that it's "so much better" than its predecessor, but that's mostly because Aliens is explicitly designed to give that particular breed of film fan a boner.

As Michael Biehn states in interviews, Aliens is "every boy's fantasy"--shit blows up, and it blows up good. The guns are so huge that it borders on parody. The main characters (bar Ripley) are wisecrackin', comic book space marines. Yes, it's supposed to be a metaphor for Vietnam or something, but comparing the Vietnamese to sinister, murderous extraterrestrials seems rather disingenuous. Then we have the massive plot hole that is at the story's foundation: as revealed in Alien, the Company knew about the derelict on LV-426. So, why then are they ignorant of it after 57 years, with the last twenty of those spent setting up a colony on the planetoid? So they mysteriously forgot it was there--surely then a survey of the planetoid before colonization would have revealed a massive alien spaceship on the surface? Not to mention the derelict was emitting a warning beacon that is apparently no longer detectable, even though Dallas and co. didn't switch it off. Fanboys pile on Alien 3's opening plothole, but frankly an egg mysteriously being on the Sulaco is a lot more plausible than the nearly-suspension of disbelief-destroying mess that is this film's setup. There are a plethora of half-assed "solutions" of these, ie the derelict was damaged by seismic activity, etc, but these really just come across as bending over backwards to try any explanation that fits. Face it: Aliens is not perfect, it is not a masterpiece like the original, and it has major flaws.

But that's okay, because what Cameron gets right here is considerable. Sigourney Weaver's spectacular, iconic reprisal of Ripley is still the only role to ever get an actress nominated for an Oscar for a science fiction film (the fact she got robbed my Marlee Matlin is ludicrous), and while the marines are mostly stupid, Michael Biehn is beyond dreamy, Lance Henriksen a nice counterpoint to Ian Holm's menacing Ash from the first film, and Jenette Goldstein is authentically badass as Vasquez. James Horner's score is memorable and exciting, despite being mostly recycled cues from his earlier work and rips from classical pieces (like every other score he's ever done). The effects are astounding, the production design convincing and top-notch.

One of the biggest issues with Aliens are the aliens themselves. Gone is the sleek, sexual look the creature had in the first film, replaced instead by a disappointingly cliche insectoid motif, right up to having a hive with a queen. Fortunately though, Cameron comes through with her: the queen is beautiful--even Giger had to concede so. Too bad that her exit is a mirror image of the alien's fate in the first film (in fact, Alien 3 is the only sequel in the series that has an ending for the creature that doesn't reprise the original film's ending, involving the alien being ejected into space through an airlock/opening).

The film's biggest strength is Cameron's masterful pacing: like the first film, Aliens starts slow, but methodically ratchets up the tension and suspense until the last act, which becomes a genuine seat-gripper of relentless action and incredible set pieces. In lesser hands, a film with as many problematic elements as this would have fallen apart, but while Cameron may not be a great filmmaker, he is far and away one of the best moviemakers, and Aliens stands next to Terminator 2 and Titanic as his best work.

(While the Special Edition cut of the film provides crucial extra backstory, the added scenes severely drag down the film's pacing, and as such the original theatrical cut is still the better version.)  


ALIEN³ (1992) 
dir. David Fincher
Rating: ✮✮✮1/2
Probably one of the most underappreciated, tragically reviled films in all of cinema, Alien³'s ludicrously torturous journey to the screen is the stuff of Hollywood infamy. There are lots of reasons to hate Alien³, one supposes--but there are far more reasons to love it. As one critic pointed out, it's more of a "brooding art film" than a sequel to Aliens, which instantly makes it fanboy kryptonite. Its photography and editing are just as accomplished as the original film, it features the best performances of the entire series (Weaver is at her most powerful, Charles S. Dutton and Charles Dance keeping pace), its score is one of the most influential of the past two decades (post-Alien³, it is seemingly a requirement that every horror score plagiarize Elliot Goldenthal's work here), the script by Walter Hill and David Giler (who wrote the actual shooting script for Alien, let us not forget) is very good, with excellent dialogue and realistic, hard-lived characters that harkens back to the first film, and on top of it all is the tone: so bleak and steeped in despair that it sends the average moviegoer fleeing, confused and angry--it's almost as if Lars von Trier directed an Alien movie.

Granted, all this refers to the Assembly Cut., though some reshot scenes in the theatrical version are stronger (the dog burster, first and foremost). Between the two cuts, however, lies something close to a masterpiece. 


ALIEN RESURRECTION (1997)
dir. Jean Pierre Jeunet
Rating: ✮✮✮
There are two camps of Alien series fans: fans of Ridley Scott's first film and fans of James Cameron's sequel, Aliens. Almost never is someone equally a fan of both. Alien fans love the series' dark atmosphere, otherworldly production design, fantastic direction, brilliantly judged editing and beautifully naturalistic acting. Aliens fans love the big explosions, big guns, and bigger aliens. Needless to say, this reviewer is in the former camp of fans. (We won't even discuss the AVP fans).

Before its slow, on-going (and justly deserved) re-appraisal by critics and audiences, Alien 3 was the fanboy punching bag of the franchise. Aside from it being hideously dismembered in post by the studio, it was unremittingly bleak (boo!), devoid of cornball Cameron one-liners (hiss!) and populated by characters that read like actual human beings and not gun-toting cartoons who struck poses, chomped cigars and fired rifles like they were in a video game with an unlimited supply of ammo. Alien fans were more sympathetic. Then came Alien Resurrection, and the Alien fans and the Aliens fans agreed in unison: it was a complete mess.

And so it is: but it is a spectacularly bizarre and perverse mess, completely unlike anything else Hollywood has ever put out. It is less an extension of the original trilogy as it is a freakishly distorted funhouse mirror version of them. It's as if James Cameron's Aliens passed through one of those teleporters from The Fly and came out fused with Delicatessen, only bigger, bloodier and with a penchant for human-alien incest. Yes, it is true that the film's script is (mostly) disappointing (and if you think its bad now, you should read Joss Whedon's original drafts before Jeunet re-invisioned it all--yikes). For every great idea like Ripley's "enhanced" genetics, quasi-Sapphic relationship with Winona Ryder, and the hideous, failed clone forerunners "1-7", there are stupid stock characters and bad one-liners aplenty (Raymond Cruz is so unbearably obnoxious that it's a highlight of the film when he gets his skull crushed into a pulp).

The designs for the aliens are, alas, also a step in the wrong direction, especially seeing as how elegant the design was in Alien 3--here the titular beasts looks like exaggerated comic book versions of their former selves, but seeing as the creatures this time around are cloned genetic freaks it's at least consistent. Ditto the much reviled Newborn, which while by no means a great design, is at least functionally repulsive and works as the monstrosity it's supposed to be.

But there is much to enjoy here: Weaver is in exceptionally fine form, re-inventing Ripley 8 as a disturbed and disillusioned warrior who gradually rediscovers her humanity through Winona Ryder's android-cum-transsexual-metaphor, and while Ryder may not give the most convincing line readings, they make for a cute pairing as the two hold each other for dear life at the film's conclusion. Elsewhere, Brad Dourif is in prime scene stealing mode, making kissy faces at aliens behind glass and exiting the picture in memorably crazy fashion. Darius Khondji's cinematography is gorgeous, all amber surfaces and rich blues and blacks, and while Jean-Pierre Jeunet's weirdo black humor grates with the material on occasion, his sense of style (the fade-outs during Ripley's awakening are an exceptionally nice touch) framing and eye for memorable visuals and set pieces cannot be denied. The underwater chase sequence is one of the highlights of the series, and Ripley's absorption into the "viper pit" one of its strongest images. Best of all, Resurrection expands on the first film's nasty sexual fixations in ways the other sequels were too afraid or preoccupied to: there is a glorious scene where Ripley sensuously snuggles up to one of her alien brethren, and the ending features the strangest make-out session in cinema. Replacing Alien 3 as the fanboy punching bag, Alien Resurrection is perhaps even more divisive than it's predecessor, but it flies its freak flag proudly, and in the wake of the disastrous AVP films is a solemn reminder of when the series dared to push boundaries and confound expectations.

Saturday, January 21, 2012

The Films of: Mamoru Oshii

Easily one of the most underappreciated filmmakers in the world (his name rarely comes up in discussions of great modern auteurs), Mamoru Oshii is the greatest living genre filmmaker, infusing each of his films with his singular visual stylings, intricately constructed plots and his penchant for genuinely profound thematic material and subtext.  He's also one of the unsung heroes of modern screen feminism: the typical Oshii protagonist is an intelligent, highly skilled woman who is self-sufficient to a fault and never defined or limited by her gender--indeed, Oshii seems to go about making a point in his work that gender (and ultimately the human body itself) is a null concept (the case of The Red Spectacles aside, wherein a female character laments that the world is "set up against women"). Even in his seminal Ghost in the Shell, where the lead character is depicted nearly nude the entire film (via the unspoken anime law of fanservice), Oshii subverts it throughout, comparing her perfectly manufactured body to a vacant store mannequin, and in the final act--wherein her body becomes exaggeratedly more masculine and ultimately destroyed--reducing his focus entirely to her spirit and mind, the only "true" parts of what make her--and us--human.

(All star ratings out of ✮✮✮✮. Films that have not been seen by the reviewer receive a "No rating" designation. Note: not all titles feature a review at present, and some titles feature only a short "reviewlet." An * beside a film title indicates a "Major work" or "Essential viewing" designation.)

Urusei Yatsura: Only You (1983)
Rating: ✮✮1/2
Mamoru Oshii's first film, Urusei Yatsura 1: Only You is nowhere near the level of brilliance that Oshii's later films would achieve, and is really a minor footnote in his filmography. Completely missing are most of Oshii's stylistic touches, visual motifs, and complex philosophy--although he would assume complete creative control over this film's sequel, and essentially turn that into an animated forerunner to his brilliant live action debut, The Red Spectacles. Not to say Only You is bad; far from it. Its fun, and Oshii does manage to slip in some scenes of great visual beauty, but it simply can't compare with its superior sequel, much less Oshii's later films, starting with his jaw-droppingly great Angel's Egg.

Urusei Yatsura: Beautiful Dreamer (1984)
Rating: ✮✮✮

Angel's Egg (1985)*
Rating: ✮✮✮✮
Whereas Mamoru Oshii's films are usually dense in both plot and ideas, Angel's Egg is almost completely devoid of plot. The director's most personal film, it is almost entirely told through surrealistic images of nature and architecture, twisted through shadow and music to convey the way religious beliefs eventually reveal themselves to be nothing more than false hope and empty promises. The title object, representing hope and innocence, is eventually destroyed by the male character, symbolizing Christ--and by extension, belief systems as a whole. Or not (your mileage can, and likely will, vary). Due to its highly subjective, almost Rorschach-test nature, the film evokes completely different emotions in the viewer on repeat viewings--watched a certain way, the ending is heartbreakingly tragic, another way, curiously hopeful. The film was made shortly after Oshii, who had trained to become a Christian priest in his youth, lost his faith, and the crumbling religiosity depicted in the film has a personal quality to it that is unforgettable.

The Red Spectacles (1987)*
Rating: ✮✮✮✮
Brilliant live action debut from Mamoru Oshii, a blackly comic Lynchian descent into extreme surrealism that will likely baffle the unprepared viewer. For film fans who love this kind of stuff, however, The Red Spectacles is sure to please: it has an army of assassin mimes (who our main hero wipes out while entirely in the nude!), bizarre slapstick, Oshii's usual assortment of striking imagery and imaginative set pieces, and marks the joyous first collaboration between the director and his longtime composer Kenji Kawai.

Patlabor the Movie (1989)
Rating: ✮✮✮

Stray Dog (1991) 
Rating: ✮✮1/2
Rather unnecessary prequel to The Red Spectacles--whereas that film was manic and bizarre, Stray Dog is elegant and pretty, with occasional lapses into surreal slapstick and amusing parody of product placement, but it never takes off the way its predecessor does and, despite composer Kenji Kawai's best attempts at lending the proceedings some soul with his excellent guitar-lead score, the film remains largely inert for most of its runtime.

Talking Head (1992)* 
Rating: ✮✮✮✮


Patlabor 2 (1993)*
Rating: ✮✮✮✮

Ghost in the Shell (1995)*
Rating: ✮✮✮✮
Like 2001, Mamoru Oshii's Ghost in the Shell is a film that concerns itself with human evolution, but while 2001 begins at the dawn of man and climaxes at the next stage in human evolution, Ghost in the Shell begins in the transitional zone between human and post-human. The film's main character, Major Motoko Kusanagi, is a government agent/assassin whose consciousness resides in a mechanical body. Oshii's usual brand of dense storytelling is at its best here--the film packs a lot of ideas and plot into a scant 78 minutes, but somehow feels twice that length (another Oshii trademark--and I am making a complimentary observation here, not a criticism). A first-time viewer will likely be overwhelmed by the plot's intricacy, but with repeat viewings, Ghost in the Shell reveals itself to be a transcendentally profound examination of the nature of humanity, and the future of our species as a whole. Oshii conveys his ideas about human individuality and consciousness through brilliantly symbolic images (the film's most acutely affecting is a sequence in which the Major, riding on a boat, looks up into an office building and sees another woman with the same body as her) and his trademark passages of lengthy, existential dialogue ("All data is both fantasy and reality" and "Your desire to remain as you are is what ultimately limits you" are among the most memorable). Both 2001 and Ghost in the Shell end with their protagonist becoming transformed into a being of pure consciousness, free of their physical bodies, but whereas 2001 views it as a mystical transformation, Oshii frames it in coldly scientific terms--a visual representation of the evolutionary tree is demolished by gunfire, and the Major and the Puppet Master combine in a form of digital sexual reproduction (the Puppet Master arguing that one of the key facets of living organisms is their ability to spawn genetically varied offspring). Oshii would expand upon many of the ideas present in this film in its sequel, but the original still remains his masterpiece for its stunning originality of thought, brilliant visuals, iconic score and innovative plot. One can only imagine how Steven Spielberg will fuck things up with his forthcoming American remake.

Avalon (2001)*
Rating: ✮✮✮✮
Mis-marketed and mangled for it's US release by Miramax, who wanted teenage boys to think they were seeing another Matrix rip-off, Avalon is nothing like that overblown popcorn bore. Quite possibly the greatest piece of high art science fiction filmmaking next to 2001: A Space Odyssey and Oshii's earlier Ghost in the Shell, Avalon is Mamoru Oshii's penultimate masterpiece; a live action film that mimics the visual style of anime more approximately than any other, combined with a peerless score from the brilliant composer Kenji Kawai, and a usually literate, philosophically complex script by Kazunori Ito (Ghost in the Shell, the superb 90's Gamera trilogy). It's all trademark Oshii, however: stunning visuals, a meditative pace, meticulously composed background details, and a transcendent central theme about humanity's place in the world, and the desire to ascend to a higher plane of existence.

So immaculately concieved and directed is the film, that Oshii walks an extremely fine line between profundity and pretention, but as is usually the case, Oshii knows how to steer through such artistically complicated waters, and the film comes through a resounding success. Avalon continues the trend Oshii started in his filmmaking with the exceptional Patlabor 2, in that it is cold, layered with numerous shades of meaning, and focuses on strong, detached heroines. So thoroughly intellectualized is the entire film that even the few action scenes have a detached, chilly quality to them--the film opens with tanks exploding, but the eruptions of flame freeze in midair, so as to deprive the audience of any real enjoyment of destruction. In the film's pre-climax battle scene featuring a giant citadel, the camera pans away from the action, and instead follows the heroine, Ash (Malgorzata Foremniak) as she slowly walks, rifle in hand, for almost a minute before resuming with the gunfire and chaos. Much of the film is composed of such brilliant shots and scenes, where an incident that takes no more than a minute or so is slowed down to last several times longer, such as Ash's visit to a hospital, as the camera tracks her in front as she walks in slow motion, accompanied by a ghostly choir on the soundtrack. The film's climax is a confrontation between Ash and a man she used to know (it is half-implied that they were lovers, but the film leaves it to interpretation), which if shown in a linear, normal fashion, would amount to no more than two minutes of screen time. Oshii, however, intercuts the scene, which takes place outside an opera house, with the opera being performed indoors--an impressive 12 minute piece by Kenji Kawai that ranks amongst the best pieces of music ever composed for a film.

Avalon demands numerous viewings to even begin to comprehend the whole picture and the totality of it's ideas. I have seen the film almost ten times now, and there is always something new, tucked quietly away in the corners of the screen, that provides a small clue to the nature of the story. Notice how when Ash exits the Avalon gaming headquarters, there is always the sound of a can being kicked, even though she never kicks a can. Notice how every statue seen in the film is beheaded, or has it's face smashed in. Notice how the majority of pedestrians in Ash's world are completely immobile, or how in the second scene with the bassett hound, the dog is heard, but never seen.

It is almost impossible to believe that the film's budget was only 8 million dollars, as it is a classy production indeed. The compter generated special effects are all first rate and rival those of big budget Hollywood productions, the score is performed by the Choir of Warsaw Philharmonic and the Warsaw Philharmonic Orchestra, and the computer-enhanced cinematography is jaw dropping in it's detail and realism. The entire first 2/3rds of Avalon are almost completely desaturated of color, with the film having a greenish-sepia tint with occasional touches of color. With all this visual wizardry on display, is it is a shock when the film reaches it's brilliant twist ending and reveals it's greatest special effect: almost no special effects at all. The finale's rebuff to the glorifying of special effects is a marvelous touch--and one that sets it apart from the dunderheaded whiz-bang likes of The Matrix and other genre pictures.

Miramax's hideous handling of the film is a real tragedy. Oshii's color scheme has been ruined, as the US edition steamrolls right through the film with an overly-oppressive sepia that washes out all the subtler color usage and just makes the film look like piss. The dialogue has been ruined as well; the English subtitles are in fact dubtitles, based upon the needlessly dumbed down English language dub that completely omits one of the film's central metaphors and replaces it with meaningless technobabble, robbing the film of much of it's intended meaning both story-wise and visually. Your best bet for seeing the film as it was intended to be seen is to buy the Korean 2-disc special edition, which is actually a copy of the Japanese special edition. It contains the accurate visual representation, as well as excellent and accurate English subtitles transcribed by the famous author Neil Gaiman (!). The film is also available on an excellent Blu-ray disc from Bandai Japan with the same picture and subtitles, although it is very pricey

Ghost in the Shell 2: Innocence (2004)* 
Rating: ✮✮✮1/2

Tachiguishi Retsuden (Amazing Lives of the Fast Food Grifters) (2006)
Rating: ✮✮✮1/2
Mamoru Oshii's Tachiguishi Retsuden is a film that can really be appreciated by an American audience only if they are familiar with the directors earlier work--most notably The Red Spectacles. It's a mockumentary chronicling the adventures of the "fast-food grifters"; basically, people who live life by stealing food in Japan throughout the country's history. The film is divided up into segments, as it moves from each 'tachigui' to the next, from characters such as Moongaze Ginji (who appeared in The Red Spectacles), Foxy Croquette O-Gin (played by the voice actress of the girl in Angel's Egg), and Hamburger Tetsu (played by Oshii's frequent composer Kenji Kawai, who also contributes another fabulous score, as per usual). The whole film is animated in what Oshii calls 'Superlivemation', which is basically applying the "puppet theater" animation style he conceived with the MINIPATO shorts to the CGI effects work he experimented with in Avalon--the results frequently achieve a surreal, comic beauty. A constant stream of striking images and clever visual puns, as well as Oshii's usual philosophizing and social commentary, Tachiguishi is almost completely inaccessible to anyone who is not at least marginally familiar with Japanese history and pop culture--as well as, again, Oshii's work, but for his loyal fans, and film lovers who yearn to see strange new sights, "Tachiguishi-Retsuden" is certainly worth a look; and if nothing else, it provides another rousing game of "Spot the Bassett Hound!"

The Sky Crawlers (2008)*
Rating: ✮✮✮1/2
Oshii's best film since Avalon. After several years of doodling around with self-indulgent pet projects and anthology works, The Sky Crawlers marks a triumphant return to his brilliant style of solemn, philosophical filmmaking.

Assault Girls (2009)
Rating: ✮✮1/2
Easily one of the weakest works of Oshii's career, Assault Girls is a slight, unnecessary spin-off of his earlier masterwork, Avalon--though this time around, things are played for laughs and self-parody, as Oshii playfully sends up the world of video gaming and, well, not much else. Being Oshii, it's of course gorgeous to look at and the jokes are sporadically amusing, but this is essentially a 15 minute short film dragged out to feature length, and is a considerable missed opportunity.

The obligatory inaugaral post.

Hello Dear Reader, and welcome to the repository for my various film reviews and essays (among other related musings, and not counting the stuff that has been published exclusively elsewhere). A brief primer of my tastes:

FAVORITE DIRECTORS:
Mamoru Oshii
David Lynch
Stanley Kubrick
Lars von Trier
Neil Jordan
Pedro Almodovar
Bong Joon-Ho
Quentin Tarantino
Christopher Guest
Michael Haneke
Ridley Scott
Tim Burton
Michelangelo Antonioni

TOP TEN FAVORITE FILMS:
1. ALIEN (1979)
2. Mulholland Dr. (2001)
3. Avalon (2001)
4. ALIEN³: Assembly Cut (1992)
5. Ghost in the Shell (1995)
6. Farewell My Concubine (1993)
7. Angel's Egg (1985)
8. 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)
9. The Rocky Horror Picture Show (1975)
10. Volver (2006)